Risk radar
Author: f | 2025-04-25
Understand the concept of a risk radar and its importance in proactive risk management. Identify the components of an effective risk radar and how they align with organizational strategy. Learn techniques for visualizing and prioritizing risks using a risk radar. Develop skills to interpret risk radar data and assess its impact on decision-making.
Risk Radar – Risk Radar is a leading risk security assessment
Global Digital Intelligence Solutions, 2022Frost Radar™: Biometric Authentication Solutions, 2022Frost Radar™: Security Screening and Detection Solutions, 2022Frost Radar: Access Control Solutions, 2022Frost Radar™: Automated Border Control eGates, 2022Frost Radar™: Surveillance Analytics, 2021CybersecurityFrost Radar™: Container and Kubernetes Security, 2024Frost Radar™: Automated Security Validation, 2024Frost Radar™: Managed Security Services in the Americas, 2024Frost Radar™: Email Security, 2024Frost Radar™: Threat Intelligence Platforms, 2024Frost Radar™: Cyber Threat Intelligence, 2024Frost Radar™: Managed Security Services in Europe, 2024Frost Radar™: Cloud Security Posture Management, 2024Frost Radar™: Workforce Identity and Access Management, 2024Frost Radar™: Managed Detection and Response, 2024Frost Radar™: Software Supply Chain Security, 2024Frost Radar™: External Risk Mitigation and Management, 2023Frost Radar™: Zero Trust Browser Security, 2023Frost Radar™: Secure Access Service Edge, 2023Frost Radar™: Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms, 2023Frost Radar™: Endpoint Security, 2023Frost Radar™: Next-Generation Firewalls, 2023Frost Radar™: Extended Detection and Response, 2023Frost Radar™: Vulnerability Management, 2023Frost Radar™: Cloud Workload Protection Platforms, 2023Frost Radar™: Network Access Control, 2023Frost Radar™: Fraud Detection and Prevention (Know Your Customer), 2023Frost Radar™: Fraud Detection and Prevention (Know Your User), 2023Frost Radar™: Security Service Edge, 2023Frost Radar™: Privileged Access Management, 2023Frost Radar™: Americas Managed and Professional Security Services, 2023Frost Radar™: Managed and Professional Security Services in Asia-Pacific, 2022Frost Radar™: Security Awareness Training, 2022Frost Radar™: Digital Risk Protection (DRP) Services, 2022Frost Radar™: External Risk Mitigation and Management (ERMM) Platforms, 2022Frost Radar™: Email Security, 2022Frost Radar™: Global Cyber Threat Intelligence Market, 2022Frost Radar™: Global Threat Intelligence Platforms Market, 2022Frost Radar™: Breach and Attack Simulation, 2022Frost Radar™: Cloud-native Application Protection Platforms, 2022Frost Radar™: Greater China Understand the concept of a risk radar and its importance in proactive risk management. Identify the components of an effective risk radar and how they align with organizational strategy. Learn techniques for visualizing and prioritizing risks using a risk radar. Develop skills to interpret risk radar data and assess its impact on decision-making. Understanding Risk Radar: At its core, Risk Radar is a strategic tool that provides organizations with a panoramic view of potential risks, akin to a radar system detecting threats in its vicinity Sound signal.By all available means. This means that a watch keeper need to use all resources available to keep a look out. These resources can be VHF, AIS, Radar and ECDIS to name a few.Appraisal of situation and risk of collision. This should be the ultimate target of the watch keeper to keep a look out. A watch keeper need to look out to find any risk of collision with any vessel. Also the watch keeper should know the present situation he is in. He should also be proactive in assessing the situation he would be in after sometime. For example, he should take into account the general traffic route (such as in TSS) which may have the other ship alter her course much before TCPA.Rule 7: Risk of collisionA good look out by sight, hearing, Radar and other available means will not miss out any targets. The next important factor of a good watch keeping is to determine if risk of collision exists.Rule no 7 gives the guidelines on how to determine if risk of collision exists.Risk of collision shall be deemed to exist if the compass bearing of an approaching vessel does not appreciably change.Approaching vessel means the distance should be decreasing andAppreciable change means that change in compass bearing by 2-3 deg would not mean that there is no risk of collision.Rule 7 also warns the watch keepers about the assumption made on scanty information specailly scanty radar information.The words Scanty information means small or insufficient information. That means the watch keeper must not assume that there is no risk of collision based upon insufficient information. Insufficient information may includeAssuming no risk of collision just by visually sighting the target without conforming the change in compass bearingAssuming no risk of collision basis radar showing 0.3~0.5 NM CPA. Watch keeper should not assume that CPA shown in radar is always accurate.Assuming no risk of collision without conforming if the target is passing ahead or astern of own vessel. On most of the radars this is shown as BCR (Bow crossing range). If the BRC is showing empty, it means the target will pass stern of own vessel. A target passing ahead of own vessel at close range is considered more risky than a target passing stern of own vessel at close range.Assuming no risk of collision for a vessel at long range (more than 12 NM) on radar. CPA shown on radar for a target at long range will often have error. While Colregs recommend long range scanning on radar, assuming no risk of collision for targets at long range can be risky. 6~8 NM is a good range for assessing risk of collision. Even for targets atComments
Global Digital Intelligence Solutions, 2022Frost Radar™: Biometric Authentication Solutions, 2022Frost Radar™: Security Screening and Detection Solutions, 2022Frost Radar: Access Control Solutions, 2022Frost Radar™: Automated Border Control eGates, 2022Frost Radar™: Surveillance Analytics, 2021CybersecurityFrost Radar™: Container and Kubernetes Security, 2024Frost Radar™: Automated Security Validation, 2024Frost Radar™: Managed Security Services in the Americas, 2024Frost Radar™: Email Security, 2024Frost Radar™: Threat Intelligence Platforms, 2024Frost Radar™: Cyber Threat Intelligence, 2024Frost Radar™: Managed Security Services in Europe, 2024Frost Radar™: Cloud Security Posture Management, 2024Frost Radar™: Workforce Identity and Access Management, 2024Frost Radar™: Managed Detection and Response, 2024Frost Radar™: Software Supply Chain Security, 2024Frost Radar™: External Risk Mitigation and Management, 2023Frost Radar™: Zero Trust Browser Security, 2023Frost Radar™: Secure Access Service Edge, 2023Frost Radar™: Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms, 2023Frost Radar™: Endpoint Security, 2023Frost Radar™: Next-Generation Firewalls, 2023Frost Radar™: Extended Detection and Response, 2023Frost Radar™: Vulnerability Management, 2023Frost Radar™: Cloud Workload Protection Platforms, 2023Frost Radar™: Network Access Control, 2023Frost Radar™: Fraud Detection and Prevention (Know Your Customer), 2023Frost Radar™: Fraud Detection and Prevention (Know Your User), 2023Frost Radar™: Security Service Edge, 2023Frost Radar™: Privileged Access Management, 2023Frost Radar™: Americas Managed and Professional Security Services, 2023Frost Radar™: Managed and Professional Security Services in Asia-Pacific, 2022Frost Radar™: Security Awareness Training, 2022Frost Radar™: Digital Risk Protection (DRP) Services, 2022Frost Radar™: External Risk Mitigation and Management (ERMM) Platforms, 2022Frost Radar™: Email Security, 2022Frost Radar™: Global Cyber Threat Intelligence Market, 2022Frost Radar™: Global Threat Intelligence Platforms Market, 2022Frost Radar™: Breach and Attack Simulation, 2022Frost Radar™: Cloud-native Application Protection Platforms, 2022Frost Radar™: Greater China
2025-04-09Sound signal.By all available means. This means that a watch keeper need to use all resources available to keep a look out. These resources can be VHF, AIS, Radar and ECDIS to name a few.Appraisal of situation and risk of collision. This should be the ultimate target of the watch keeper to keep a look out. A watch keeper need to look out to find any risk of collision with any vessel. Also the watch keeper should know the present situation he is in. He should also be proactive in assessing the situation he would be in after sometime. For example, he should take into account the general traffic route (such as in TSS) which may have the other ship alter her course much before TCPA.Rule 7: Risk of collisionA good look out by sight, hearing, Radar and other available means will not miss out any targets. The next important factor of a good watch keeping is to determine if risk of collision exists.Rule no 7 gives the guidelines on how to determine if risk of collision exists.Risk of collision shall be deemed to exist if the compass bearing of an approaching vessel does not appreciably change.Approaching vessel means the distance should be decreasing andAppreciable change means that change in compass bearing by 2-3 deg would not mean that there is no risk of collision.Rule 7 also warns the watch keepers about the assumption made on scanty information specailly scanty radar information.The words Scanty information means small or insufficient information. That means the watch keeper must not assume that there is no risk of collision based upon insufficient information. Insufficient information may includeAssuming no risk of collision just by visually sighting the target without conforming the change in compass bearingAssuming no risk of collision basis radar showing 0.3~0.5 NM CPA. Watch keeper should not assume that CPA shown in radar is always accurate.Assuming no risk of collision without conforming if the target is passing ahead or astern of own vessel. On most of the radars this is shown as BCR (Bow crossing range). If the BRC is showing empty, it means the target will pass stern of own vessel. A target passing ahead of own vessel at close range is considered more risky than a target passing stern of own vessel at close range.Assuming no risk of collision for a vessel at long range (more than 12 NM) on radar. CPA shown on radar for a target at long range will often have error. While Colregs recommend long range scanning on radar, assuming no risk of collision for targets at long range can be risky. 6~8 NM is a good range for assessing risk of collision. Even for targets at
2025-04-08Of this Citi Research product ("the Product"), please contact Citi Research, 388 Greenwich Street, 6th Floor, New York, NY, 10013, Attention: Legal/Compliance [E6WYB6412478]. In addition, the same important disclosures, with the exception of the Valuation and Risk assessments and historical disclosures, are contained on the Firm's disclosure website at Valuation and Risk assessments can be found in the text of the most recent research note/report regarding the subject company. Pursuant to the Market Abuse Regulation a history of all Citi Research recommendations published during the preceding 12-month period can be accessed via Citi Velocity ( or your standard distribution portal. Historical disclosures (for up to the past three years) will be provided upon request.Citi Research Equity Ratings Distribution12 Month RatingCatalyst WatchData current as of 01 Jan 2025BuyHoldSellBuyHoldSellCiti Research Global Fundamental Coverage (Neutral=Hold)57%34%9%35%48%17%% of companies in each rating category that are investment banking clients43%44%35%47%40%42%Citi Research Quantitative World Radar Screen Model Coverage30%40%30%% of companies in each rating category that are investment banking clients29%18%15%Citi Research Quantitative Latam Radar Screen Model Coverage21%58%21%% of companies in each rating category that are investment banking clients48%50%45%Citi Research Quantitative Asia Radar Screen Model Coverage20%60%20%% of companies in each rating category that are investment banking clients24%12%6%Citi Research Quantitative Australia Radar Screen Model Coverage41%0%59%% of companies in each rating category that are investment banking clients43%0%26%Guide to Citi Research Fundamental Research Investment Ratings:Citi Research stock recommendations include an investment rating and an optional risk rating to highlight high risk stocks.Risk rating takes into account both price volatility and fundamental criteria. Stocks will either have no risk rating or a High risk rating assigned.Investment Ratings: Citi Research investment ratings are Buy, Neutral and Sell. Our ratings are a function of analyst expectations of expected total return ("ETR") and risk. ETR is the sum of the forecast price appreciation (or depreciation) plus the dividend yield for a stock within the next 12 months. The target price is based on a 12 month time horizon. The Investment rating definitions are: Buy (1) ETR of 15% or more or 25% or more for High risk stocks; and Sell (3) for negative ETR. Any covered stock not assigned a Buy or a Sell is a Neutral (2). For stocks rated Neutral (2), if an analyst believes that there are insufficient valuation drivers and/or investment catalysts to derive a positive or negative investment view, they may elect with the approval of Citi Research management not to assign
2025-04-04